Lambert v Lambert [2002] EWCA Civ 1685
Judgment date: 14 November 2002
Related
Special Contributions: ‘Genius’, Guesswork and Gender Discrimination
This article revisits the contested terrain of ‘special contribution’, and questions whether it retains any legitimate role in contemporary financial remedy jurisprudence. It argues that the concept is both theoretically discriminatory and practically uncertain.
SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 June 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544
Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets.
Background
The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no
DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68
Judgment date: 05 April 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68
Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019.
H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
Special Contributions: ‘Genius’, Guesswork and Gender Discrimination
This article revisits the contested terrain of ‘special contribution’, and questions whether it retains any legitimate role in contemporary financial remedy jurisprudence. It argues that the concept is both theoretically discriminatory and practically uncertain.
SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 June 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544
Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets.
Background
The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no
DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68
Judgment date: 05 April 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68
Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019.
H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a
Latest
Free Webinar | The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Join the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor - as they discuss its origins, drafting and intentions - and its likely impact on financial remedy cases at all levels in the months and years ahead.
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.