KSO v MJO & Ors [2008] EWHC 3031 (Fam)
Judgment date: 08 December 2008
Related
The Consequences of Late Service of an N260 for Summary Assessment of Costs: Prejudice and Proportionality
The requirement to serve a statement of costs (Form N260) for the purposes of summary assessment of costs is set out in CPR PD 44 para 9.5. But what are the consequences of a breach of the rule to serve the statement of costs not less than 24 hours before the start of the hearing?
Pool v Pool [2026] EWFC 226 (B)
3 August 2026. DDJ Hales. Competent conduct of legal professionals is not negotiable.
Doweck v Doweck [2026] EWFC 238 (B)
4 August 2026. DJ Hammond. The court was concerned with an application for committal by W to commit H to prison.
Related
The Consequences of Late Service of an N260 for Summary Assessment of Costs: Prejudice and Proportionality
The requirement to serve a statement of costs (Form N260) for the purposes of summary assessment of costs is set out in CPR PD 44 para 9.5. But what are the consequences of a breach of the rule to serve the statement of costs not less than 24 hours before the start of the hearing?
Pool v Pool [2026] EWFC 226 (B)
3 August 2026. DDJ Hales. Competent conduct of legal professionals is not negotiable.
Doweck v Doweck [2026] EWFC 238 (B)
4 August 2026. DJ Hammond. The court was concerned with an application for committal by W to commit H to prison.
Latest
The Astonishing Fate of Scott v Scott (1911-1913)
Secrecy in family cases from the Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes (1858) to the Financial Remedies Court (2024)
The Consequences of Late Service of an N260 for Summary Assessment of Costs: Prejudice and Proportionality
The requirement to serve a statement of costs (Form N260) for the purposes of summary assessment of costs is set out in CPR PD 44 para 9.5. But what are the consequences of a breach of the rule to serve the statement of costs not less than 24 hours before the start of the hearing?
Is It Time for the Conclusions in Waggott to Be Reconsidered?
There is arguably a far greater understanding now than there was even as recently as 2018 of domestic abuse and the wide-reaching and long-lasting impact that it can have. Does this mean it is time for the Court of Appeal to reconsider the conclusions it reached in Waggott?