Haskell v Haskell [2021] EWCA Civ 1295
Judgment date: 20 July 2021
Related
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413
Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
Collardeau v Fuchs [2025] EWFC 413
https://dmscdn.vuelio.co.uk/publicitem/28113975-262d-40e1-9859-d1dccf6994a0
Sandra Ozturk v Yilmaz Ozturk [2025] EWFC 333 (B)
HHJ Moreton. Suspended committal activated: 28 days’ immediate imprisonment for wilful breach of a Form E disclosure order in financial remedy proceedings.
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413
Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
Collardeau v Fuchs [2025] EWFC 413
https://dmscdn.vuelio.co.uk/publicitem/28113975-262d-40e1-9859-d1dccf6994a0
Sandra Ozturk v Yilmaz Ozturk [2025] EWFC 333 (B)
HHJ Moreton. Suspended committal activated: 28 days’ immediate imprisonment for wilful breach of a Form E disclosure order in financial remedy proceedings.
Latest
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.