national archives Sharing Principle Wells Sharing Open in ED v AP [2025] EWFC 399 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2025/399.html Access deniedHis Honour Judge Edward Hess Related HC v SW [2026] EWFC 237 13 July 2026. Trowell J. Final hearing to determine the extent to which one party's receipt of restricted stock units and carried interest post-separation should be considered matrimonial property and subject to sharing. Culligan v Rosemin-Culligan [2026] EWCA Civ 948 24 July 2026. Moylan LJ giving the lead judgment with Coulson and Arnold LJJ agreeing. The Court of Appeal gives clarity on Wells sharing. IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs. Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer Open in Related HC v SW [2026] EWFC 237 13 July 2026. Trowell J. Final hearing to determine the extent to which one party's receipt of restricted stock units and carried interest post-separation should be considered matrimonial property and subject to sharing. Culligan v Rosemin-Culligan [2026] EWCA Civ 948 24 July 2026. Moylan LJ giving the lead judgment with Coulson and Arnold LJJ agreeing. The Court of Appeal gives clarity on Wells sharing. IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs. Latest Tech Corner: Only 11%. What Technology Can Do About the Pensions Gap on Divorce [2026] 3 FRJ 266. Only 11% of divorcees with a pension not yet in payment made any arrangement to share it, according to the Fair Shares study, which also found that over a third of divorcees did not know the value of their own pension. Ignoring the pensions is not an option. Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: Time for Greater Discipline? [2026] 3 FRJ 206. If costs discipline is to be meaningful, parties must understand from the outset that disproportionate litigation expenditure will ultimately remain their own responsibility even in a needs case. Money spent on costs is money removed from the resources available to the family. IFoA Working Party for Pensions on Divorce: Full Resources Now Published Building on the work of the Pensions Advisory Group and the IFoA thematic review of work by actuary PODEs, an IFoA working party has published essential new materials to further develop good practice in this area. Family lawyers should look for, and request, PODE adoption of these materials. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
HC v SW [2026] EWFC 237 13 July 2026. Trowell J. Final hearing to determine the extent to which one party's receipt of restricted stock units and carried interest post-separation should be considered matrimonial property and subject to sharing.
Culligan v Rosemin-Culligan [2026] EWCA Civ 948 24 July 2026. Moylan LJ giving the lead judgment with Coulson and Arnold LJJ agreeing. The Court of Appeal gives clarity on Wells sharing.
IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs.
HC v SW [2026] EWFC 237 13 July 2026. Trowell J. Final hearing to determine the extent to which one party's receipt of restricted stock units and carried interest post-separation should be considered matrimonial property and subject to sharing.
Culligan v Rosemin-Culligan [2026] EWCA Civ 948 24 July 2026. Moylan LJ giving the lead judgment with Coulson and Arnold LJJ agreeing. The Court of Appeal gives clarity on Wells sharing.
IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs.
Tech Corner: Only 11%. What Technology Can Do About the Pensions Gap on Divorce [2026] 3 FRJ 266. Only 11% of divorcees with a pension not yet in payment made any arrangement to share it, according to the Fair Shares study, which also found that over a third of divorcees did not know the value of their own pension. Ignoring the pensions is not an option.
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: Time for Greater Discipline? [2026] 3 FRJ 206. If costs discipline is to be meaningful, parties must understand from the outset that disproportionate litigation expenditure will ultimately remain their own responsibility even in a needs case. Money spent on costs is money removed from the resources available to the family.
IFoA Working Party for Pensions on Divorce: Full Resources Now Published Building on the work of the Pensions Advisory Group and the IFoA thematic review of work by actuary PODEs, an IFoA working party has published essential new materials to further develop good practice in this area. Family lawyers should look for, and request, PODE adoption of these materials.