DN v HN [2014] EWHC 3435 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 August 2014
Related
A and Z (No 2) (Interim Third Party Debt Order), Re [2026] EWFC 90
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/90?query=A+Z+%28No+2%29+%28Interim+Third+Party+Debt+Order%29%2C+Re+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+90
Wei-Lyn Loh v Ardal Loh-Gronager [2025] EWFC 483
Cusworth J. Sums the husband unilaterally removed from a mortgage account and joint bank accounts during the marriage are held to be part of his entitlement under a pre-nuptial agreement, partially due to conduct findings.
A v Z [2026] EWHC 654 (Fam)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2026/654
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
A and Z (No 2) (Interim Third Party Debt Order), Re [2026] EWFC 90
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/90?query=A+Z+%28No+2%29+%28Interim+Third+Party+Debt+Order%29%2C+Re+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+90
Wei-Lyn Loh v Ardal Loh-Gronager [2025] EWFC 483
Cusworth J. Sums the husband unilaterally removed from a mortgage account and joint bank accounts during the marriage are held to be part of his entitlement under a pre-nuptial agreement, partially due to conduct findings.
A v Z [2026] EWHC 654 (Fam)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2026/654
Latest
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.
The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Watch the recording of ‘The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know’, first broadcast on Wednesday 6th May 2026 with the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.