Constantinides v Constantinides [2013] EWHC 3688 (Fam)
Judgment date: 06 November 2013
Related
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413
Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
Collardeau v Fuchs [2025] EWFC 413
https://dmscdn.vuelio.co.uk/publicitem/28113975-262d-40e1-9859-d1dccf6994a0
Sandra Ozturk v Yilmaz Ozturk [2025] EWFC 333 (B)
HHJ Moreton. Suspended committal activated: 28 days’ immediate imprisonment for wilful breach of a Form E disclosure order in financial remedy proceedings.
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413
Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
Collardeau v Fuchs [2025] EWFC 413
https://dmscdn.vuelio.co.uk/publicitem/28113975-262d-40e1-9859-d1dccf6994a0
Sandra Ozturk v Yilmaz Ozturk [2025] EWFC 333 (B)
HHJ Moreton. Suspended committal activated: 28 days’ immediate imprisonment for wilful breach of a Form E disclosure order in financial remedy proceedings.
Latest
Piercing Trust Structures in Switzerland in Aid of Financial Claims in England
[2026] 1 FRJ 26. Swiss courts possess domestic tools to pierce through foreign trust structures and make orders in respect of their underlying assets. This article examines what those tools are and how they may be deployed in aid of financial remedies proceedings in England.
Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases
[2026] 1 FRJ 16. In Ramana v Kist Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022, [2025] 4 WLR 120 the Court of Appeal was concerned with the question of how a domicile of choice may be lost. This article explores the arguments made at the hearing, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the likely implications.
Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH
HHJ Farquhar was confronted with the practical consequences of Mazur for family law cases. The issue arose when Family Law Partners, a highly respected specialist family law firm, sought an exemption permitting their senior Chartered Legal Executive, Ms Lisa Burton Durham, to conduct litigation.