Collardeau v Fuchs [2025] EWFC 307
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/307
Poole J
Related
F v EE (Enforcement under Sch 1 CA : s423 Insolvency Act 1986) [2026] EWFC 249 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/249
The Myth of a General Equitable Jurisdiction to Reconsider Financial Remedy Orders
If the Thwaite jurisdiction exists, the doctrine should only need to be invoked in exceptionally rare cases. Ordinarily, careful drafting of a non-variable property adjustment order should provide for future contingencies, however remote or unlikely.
JC v MC [2026] EWFC 145
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/145
Related
F v EE (Enforcement under Sch 1 CA : s423 Insolvency Act 1986) [2026] EWFC 249 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/249
The Myth of a General Equitable Jurisdiction to Reconsider Financial Remedy Orders
If the Thwaite jurisdiction exists, the doctrine should only need to be invoked in exceptionally rare cases. Ordinarily, careful drafting of a non-variable property adjustment order should provide for future contingencies, however remote or unlikely.
JC v MC [2026] EWFC 145
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/145
Latest
My Time on the Family Procedure Rule Committee
The Vice Chair of the FRJ Editorial Board talks about his six years as a barrister member of the Family Procedure Rule Committee.
Intervenor Cases: Preliminary Issue Hearing or FDR (or NCDR)?
Should case management decisions in intervenor cases place greater focus on the opportunities presented by an FDR or NCDR taking place prior to a preliminary issue hearing?
Standish One Year On – Is There Agreement As to What It Means?
The question of whether property that is matrimonial property has as a consequence to be shared equally has become one of the main areas of debate in the first instance decisions over the last year.