Breakspear & Ors v Ackland & Dunning [2008] EWHC 220
Judgment date: 19 February 2008
Related
MK v SK [2026] EWFC 28
Peel J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with findings of non-disclosure against H. Final orders determined with reference to W's needs.
Piercing Trust Structures in Switzerland in Aid of Financial Claims in England
[2026] 1 FRJ 26. Swiss courts possess domestic tools to pierce through foreign trust structures and make orders in respect of their underlying assets. This article examines what those tools are and how they may be deployed in aid of financial remedies proceedings in England.
Trusts in Divorce Proceedings: The Trustee’s Adviser’s Perspective
[2026] 1 FRJ 30. This article provides a perspective on trusts within English financial remedy proceedings, from the perspective of trustees and law firms in Jersey. These days, the view of offshore trusts as a vehicle for hiding assets from authorities, creditors and spouses is unlikely to be true.
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
MK v SK [2026] EWFC 28
Peel J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with findings of non-disclosure against H. Final orders determined with reference to W's needs.
Piercing Trust Structures in Switzerland in Aid of Financial Claims in England
[2026] 1 FRJ 26. Swiss courts possess domestic tools to pierce through foreign trust structures and make orders in respect of their underlying assets. This article examines what those tools are and how they may be deployed in aid of financial remedies proceedings in England.
Trusts in Divorce Proceedings: The Trustee’s Adviser’s Perspective
[2026] 1 FRJ 30. This article provides a perspective on trusts within English financial remedy proceedings, from the perspective of trustees and law firms in Jersey. These days, the view of offshore trusts as a vehicle for hiding assets from authorities, creditors and spouses is unlikely to be true.
Latest
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.