Cases Striking Out Applications Open in Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] AC 550 Judgment date: 17 June 1999https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1999/25.html Related JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335 Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child. M v B [2025] EWFC 182 Judgment date: 25 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182 Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A. The Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam) Judgment date: 12 December 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193 Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring Open in Related JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335 Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child. M v B [2025] EWFC 182 Judgment date: 25 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182 Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A. The Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam) Judgment date: 12 December 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193 Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis Latest How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology? Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need. Interview with Richard Sax On 11 February 2026 there was a celebratory lunch with the past recipients of Resolution’s John Cornwell Lifetime Achievement Award, organised by David Emmerson, who here interviews Richard Sax. The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3) Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335 Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.
M v B [2025] EWFC 182 Judgment date: 25 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182 Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A. The
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam) Judgment date: 12 December 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193 Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335 Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.
M v B [2025] EWFC 182 Judgment date: 25 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182 Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A. The
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam) Judgment date: 12 December 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193 Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology? Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need.
Interview with Richard Sax On 11 February 2026 there was a celebratory lunch with the past recipients of Resolution’s John Cornwell Lifetime Achievement Award, organised by David Emmerson, who here interviews Richard Sax.
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3) Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.