Cases Striking Out Applications Open in Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] AC 550 Judgment date: 17 June 1999https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1999/25.html Related JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335 Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child. M v B [2025] EWFC 182 Judgment date: 25 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182 Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A. The Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam) Judgment date: 12 December 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193 Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer Open in Related JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335 Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child. M v B [2025] EWFC 182 Judgment date: 25 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182 Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A. The Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam) Judgment date: 12 December 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193 Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis Latest Some Thoughts on Possible Structural and Resource Issues for the Financial Remedies Court Arising Out of the Government’s Approach to Reform of Financial Remedies Law in Their Paper ‘A Fairer End to Relationships’ Some thoughts on possible structural and resource issues for the Financial Remedies Court arising out of the Government’s approach to reform of Financial Remedies Law in their paper A Fairer End to Relationships. A Fairer End to Cohabiting Relationships? Some Problems with the Government’s Reform Proposals This article critiques the Ministry of Justice’s proposed framework of financial remedies for separating cohabitants, as set out in its recent consultation paper, A Fairer End to Relationships. The ‘Manchester Model’; Combining ENE/pFDRs and LAM (Lawyer Assisted Mediation). The Most Effective NCDR in Financial Remedy Cases? This article examines a combined non-court dispute resolution model for financial remedy cases, bringing together early neutral evaluation/private FDR and lawyer-assisted or hybrid mediation within a single coordinated process. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335 Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.
M v B [2025] EWFC 182 Judgment date: 25 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182 Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A. The
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam) Judgment date: 12 December 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193 Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335 Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.
M v B [2025] EWFC 182 Judgment date: 25 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182 Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A. The
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam) Judgment date: 12 December 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193 Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
Some Thoughts on Possible Structural and Resource Issues for the Financial Remedies Court Arising Out of the Government’s Approach to Reform of Financial Remedies Law in Their Paper ‘A Fairer End to Relationships’ Some thoughts on possible structural and resource issues for the Financial Remedies Court arising out of the Government’s approach to reform of Financial Remedies Law in their paper A Fairer End to Relationships.
A Fairer End to Cohabiting Relationships? Some Problems with the Government’s Reform Proposals This article critiques the Ministry of Justice’s proposed framework of financial remedies for separating cohabitants, as set out in its recent consultation paper, A Fairer End to Relationships.
The ‘Manchester Model’; Combining ENE/pFDRs and LAM (Lawyer Assisted Mediation). The Most Effective NCDR in Financial Remedy Cases? This article examines a combined non-court dispute resolution model for financial remedy cases, bringing together early neutral evaluation/private FDR and lawyer-assisted or hybrid mediation within a single coordinated process.