B v B [2012] 2 FLR 22
Judgment date: 16 January 2012
Related
Pensions and Divorce – Which Valuation Should You Use?
One issue which crops up regularly when advising parties on the division of pension rights on divorce is how pensions should be valued, and in particular whether the cash equivalent transfer value (CETV or CEV) is appropriate for this purpose.
AP v TP (Pension Enforcement) [2025] EWFC 190 (B)
Judgment date: 13 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/190
Summary
HHJ Farquhar. Application by husband (applicant) to set aside a pension sharing order (PSO) under the Thwaite jurisdiction due to the wife’s sustained non-compliance. The court held that continued enforcement of the PSO would
Dangers of Applying PSOs Determined Using pre-McCloud CEVs on ‘McCloud compliant’ CEVs
Those working in the Pensions on Divorce arena (whether PODEs, solicitors or scheme administrators) will by now be all too familiar with the McCloud ruling, and how much additional work this has caused for cases involving public sector pension schemes.
To quickly recap, the McCloud ruling requires (i) for the
Related
Pensions and Divorce – Which Valuation Should You Use?
One issue which crops up regularly when advising parties on the division of pension rights on divorce is how pensions should be valued, and in particular whether the cash equivalent transfer value (CETV or CEV) is appropriate for this purpose.
AP v TP (Pension Enforcement) [2025] EWFC 190 (B)
Judgment date: 13 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/190
Summary
HHJ Farquhar. Application by husband (applicant) to set aside a pension sharing order (PSO) under the Thwaite jurisdiction due to the wife’s sustained non-compliance. The court held that continued enforcement of the PSO would
Dangers of Applying PSOs Determined Using pre-McCloud CEVs on ‘McCloud compliant’ CEVs
Those working in the Pensions on Divorce arena (whether PODEs, solicitors or scheme administrators) will by now be all too familiar with the McCloud ruling, and how much additional work this has caused for cases involving public sector pension schemes.
To quickly recap, the McCloud ruling requires (i) for the
Latest
Thwaite – The Jury Remains Out
[2026] 2 FRJ 99. Does the Thwaite jurisdiction still exist? If it does, what is its appropriate scope? The Court of Appeal will be required to decide.
Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims
[2026] 2 FRJ 88. Cross-examination can have a material impact on the court’s findings of fact and determination of issues. This article is written for the occasional cross-examiner, as an aide mémoire of the rules, as a guide to doing the job well.
A Fairer End? Gaps in the Government’s Nuptial Agreement Proposals
On 5 June 2026, the Government published A Fairer End to Relationships, proposing comprehensive reform of the financial consequences of both divorce and separation for unmarried couples. This piece focuses on the Government’s plan to introduce binding qualifying nuptial agreements (QNAs).