Adrian Barnett-Thoung-Holland (Coram Chambers)

Adrian Barnett-Thoung-Holland (Coram Chambers)

Adrian Barnett-Thoung-Holland is a family barrister at Coram Chambers, specialising exclusively in financial remedies, claims under TLATA 1996 and more.

read more

Uncertain Futures in Pensions Enforcement – What happened to Blight v Brewster?

[2026] 2 FRJ 132. The remedy in Blight v Brewster has been partially overridden by the decision in Manolete Partners Plc v White. While the original remedy appears to remain in existence, it seems to be no longer an attractive method of enforcement.

Thoughts on Applications to Withdraw Financial Remedy Proceedings

Thoughts on Applications to Withdraw Financial Remedy Proceedings

While unusual, it is possible and occasionally necessary for an applicant in financial remedy proceedings to withdraw their application, and all other related applications. The problem that arises commonly in this unusual situation is ‘what happens next?’ It commonly happens in financial remedy proceedings that, as the proceedings evolve, certain

Qualified Legal Representatives in Financial Remedy Proceedings

Qualified Legal Representatives in Financial Remedy Proceedings

The recent decision in AXA v BYB (QLR Financial Remedies) [2023] EWFC 251 (B) is the first time in which a qualified legal representative (QLR) was appointed and used in a financial remedies final hearing at the Central Family Court. There had been scant other authorities in respect of QLRs

Adrian Barnett-Thoung-Holland

Adrian Barnett-Thoung-Holland is a family barrister at Coram Chambers, specialising exclusively in financial remedies, claims under TLATA 1996 and applications under Sch 1 CA 1989. He appeared on behalf of the respondent in AXA v BYB (QLR: Financial Remedies) [2023] EWFC 251 (B).