Address for litigants in person to send documents in financial remedies proceedings for scanning on to Portal
Related
FPR PD 27A and Procedural Ambush – A Litigant in Person’s Perspective
This article, the anonymous writer explains, is not about abuse during the marriage, but rather the abuse hidden in court procedure, in particular how the habitual disregard of FPR PD 27A1 paves the way to procedural ambush, why this matters, and what must change in order to safeguard justice.
Family BarLink: The CFC Pro Bono Duty Scheme
A new pro bono scheme assisting litigants in person in family proceedings at the Central Family Court – background
As we are all acutely aware, restrictions in the provision of legal aid following the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 have resulted in a sharp increase in the
Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025
The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle
Related
FPR PD 27A and Procedural Ambush – A Litigant in Person’s Perspective
This article, the anonymous writer explains, is not about abuse during the marriage, but rather the abuse hidden in court procedure, in particular how the habitual disregard of FPR PD 27A1 paves the way to procedural ambush, why this matters, and what must change in order to safeguard justice.
Family BarLink: The CFC Pro Bono Duty Scheme
A new pro bono scheme assisting litigants in person in family proceedings at the Central Family Court – background
As we are all acutely aware, restrictions in the provision of legal aid following the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 have resulted in a sharp increase in the
Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025
The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle
Latest
Keep Calm and Carry on: A v M in a Wells World
[2026] 2 FRJ 114. This article takes a closer look at how Carry was shared in the cases of A v M and ED v AP, and the different approaches adopted for its assessment. It concludes by proposing an alternative method by which Carry can be shared when the timing of future receipts is unknown.
Thwaite – The Jury Remains Out
[2026] 2 FRJ 99. Does the Thwaite jurisdiction still exist? If it does, what is its appropriate scope? The Court of Appeal will be required to decide.
Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims
[2026] 2 FRJ 88. Cross-examination can have a material impact on the court’s findings of fact and determination of issues. This article is written for the occasional cross-examiner, as an aide mémoire of the rules, as a guide to doing the job well.