AAZ v BBZ & Ors [2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam)

Judgment date: 20 December 2016

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2016/3349.html

Related

TYB v CAR (Non-Disclosure) (No 2) [2025] EWFC 263 (B)

DDJ David Hodson. Final hearing concerning maintenance for wife in a case with serious non-disclosure.

BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236

Peel J. Save for four specific matters, parties cannot refer to what happened at the pFDR. The Financial Remedies Court – Primary Principles paragraph 8 issued by Mostyn J and HHJ Hess goes too far by saying that the court should be told that offers were made and that an was indication given.

Abigail Laura Williams v Andrew John Williams [2024] EWFC 275

Judgment date: 06 August 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/275 Final order of Moor J in financial remedy proceedings involving a husband who had continually breached court orders, failed to attend hearings, and provided unreliable and ‘demonstrably untrue’ evidence. Background H (56) and W (59) married in

Read the journal

Related

TYB v CAR (Non-Disclosure) (No 2) [2025] EWFC 263 (B)

DDJ David Hodson. Final hearing concerning maintenance for wife in a case with serious non-disclosure.

BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236

Peel J. Save for four specific matters, parties cannot refer to what happened at the pFDR. The Financial Remedies Court – Primary Principles paragraph 8 issued by Mostyn J and HHJ Hess goes too far by saying that the court should be told that offers were made and that an was indication given.

Abigail Laura Williams v Andrew John Williams [2024] EWFC 275

Judgment date: 06 August 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/275 Final order of Moor J in financial remedy proceedings involving a husband who had continually breached court orders, failed to attend hearings, and provided unreliable and ‘demonstrably untrue’ evidence. Background H (56) and W (59) married in

Latest

Portals: Bringing It All Together

Portals: Bringing It All Together

Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.

FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked

FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked

Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.

The Reluctant Pension Credit Member

The Reluctant Pension Credit Member

[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS