Single Joint Experts
Two Heads, Better than One? BR v BR, in Light of BR v BR (No 2) and Vince v Vince
In his judgment in BR v BR [2024] EWFC 11, [2024] 2 FLR 217, Peel J emphasised at [17](i) that ‘[w]herever possible’ the instruction of a single joint expert (SJE) is the ‘default position’ and at [17](ii) that a ‘high degree of justification’ is required for two parties to instruct their own experts.
- Journal
- Family Procedure Rules
- Single Joint Experts
- Experts
- Valuations
!30/06/2025 06:00
Money Corner: EBITDA – The Valuer’s Measure of Profit
EBITDA – the valuer’s measure of profit, and other measures that may be considered.
- Journal
- EBITDA
- Revenue
- Single Joint Experts
- Profit
- Market Value
- Business Valuation
- Market Approach
- Valuations
!22/11/2024 06:00
Single and Joint: Peel J Discusses Expert Evidence in BR v BR [2024] EWFC 11
In BR v BR [2024] EWFC 11, Peel J took the opportunity, in his role as head of the FRC, to ‘do a written judgment as one or two points of principle arise’. Specifically: the use of single joint experts in financial remedy proceedings. This is an important decision informing family lawyers how cases should be conducted.
- Blog
- Single Joint Experts
- SJE
!03/04/2024 10:25
©2024 Class Legal classlegal.com
