Joinder of Third Parties
-
Teasdale v Carter and Teasdale [2023] EWHC 490 (Fam)7 March 2023
Moor J. Appeal in farming estoppel case with astronomical costs far exceeding the value of the property in question.The first respondent, Ms Carter, was the elder daughter of the appellant mother and second respondent father. During the parents’ fin…
- Cases
- TLATA Applications
- Costs
- Joinder of Third Parties
-
Simon v Simon & Level (Joinder) (Rev1) [2022] EWFC 2921 March 2022
Nicholas Cusworth QC. Convoluted procedural history in which a consent order was sealed by the court without knowledge of other relevant applications, and W received no liquid capital capable of being used to repay her litigation funder. Funder therefore…
- Cases
- Litigation Funding
- Joinder of Third Parties
- Setting Aside Orders (Including Barder Applications)
-
Fisher Meredith v JH and PH (Financial Remedy: Appeal: Wasted Costs) [2012] EWHC 408 (Fam)2 March 2012
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2012/408.html
- Cases
- TLATA Applications
- Interest
- Joinder of Third Parties
- First Appointments
-
TM v AH [2016] EWHC 572 (Fam)4 March 2016
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2016/572.html
- Cases
- Variation of Settlements
- Joinder of Third Parties
- Trusts
-
DR v GR & Ors [2013] EWHC 1196 (Fam)10 May 2013
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/1196.html
- Cases
- Variation of Settlements
- Joinder of Third Parties
-
Edgerton v Edgerton & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 18124 February 2012
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/181.html
- Cases
- Joinder of Third Parties
-
TL v ML & Ors (Ancillary Relief: Claim Against Assets of Extended Family) [2005] EWHC 2860 (Fam), [2006] 1 FCR 465, [2006] 1 FLR 12639 December 2005
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2005/2860.html
- Cases
- FDRs
- Life Expectancy
- TLATA Applications
- Joinder of Third Parties
- Legal Services Payment Orders
- First Appointments
-
Goldstone v Goldstone [2011] EWCA Civ 39, [2011] 1 FCR 324, [2011] 1 FLR 192628 January 2011
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/39.html
- Cases
- TLATA Applications
- Joinder of Third Parties
-
LS v PS [2021] EWHC 3508 (Fam)18 January 2022
An application by an intervenor in financial remedy proceedings for disclosure of privileged material from a PFDR was refused. The intervenor, a litigation funder, is seeking to set aside a consent order reached at the PFDR on the basis it was deliberately structured to ensure W could not meet her debt. The court acknowledged that a number of competing policy considerations were engaged, in the process attaching importance to the status of litigation funders. Whilst this application was refused on the facts, Roberts J referred the “absolute bar” (as Munby P has interpreted paragraph 6.2 PD9A) on use of anything said or done at FDR in support of a separate action in civil proceedings to the Family Procedure Rules Committee. In further judicial support for private dispute resolution, Roberts J thought it artificial to draw a distinction between the privilege attaching under paragraph 6.2 PD9A to “in-court” and private FDRs.
- Cases
- FDRs
- Privilege
- Disclosure
- Litigation Funding
- Joinder of Third Parties