Published: 07/04/2025 08:41
Grace-Mary Sweeney is a pupil at 1 King’s Bench Walk. Prior to joining 1KBW as a pupil, Grace-Mary worked as a paralegal at a London-based family law firm, specialising in financial remedy, private law children, and international matters. Grace-Mary also worked as a Judicial Assistant in the Family Division of the High Court. She worked as a Guest Teacher in Family Law at the London School of Economics (LSE).
©2024 Class Legal classlegal.com
HHJ Moradifar. Application by the husband for an anti-suit injunction to prevent the wife from pursuing, participating or otherwise continuing any applications for periodical payments for the children of the family or any other applications relating to their marriage in the courts of India.
As Mostyn J observed in Clarke v Clarke [2023] 2 FLR 1 at [36], Peel J’s oft-quoted summary of the law in WC v HC (Financial Remedies Agreements) (Rev 1) [2022] 2 FLR 1110 at [21] is an ‘impeccable synopsis of the jurisprudence applicable in financial remedy cases [which] has become justly famous’. Somewhat more colloquially, Peel J has himself said (with a smile) that he has heard his summary described as ‘the Noddy Guide’ to financial remedies.
!01/04/2025 10:20
Mr Nicholas Allen KC. Application for costs following a final hearing.
In family proceedings, the court has two key tools at its disposal to address the funding of litigation. The first is via an LSPO to meet the incurrence of future legal fees, and the second, quite distinct in nature and purpose, is a costs order, providing for one party to pay the costs that have already been incurred by the other party.
!07/04/2025 10:00
The main focus in cases under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 is often on how to meet the housing needs of a child; understandably so, as it is usually the largest cost. It can also be the starting point for settlement as the type of property and loca…
!06/07/2022 07:07
message