Cases
-
L [2015] EWFC 1526 February 2015
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2015/15.html
- Cases
- Bundles
-
B v S (Financial Remedy: Marital Property Regime) [2012] EWHC 265 (Fam), [2012] 2 FLR 50217 February 2012
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2012/265.html
- Cases
- Sharing Principle
- Spousal Maintenance (Quantum)
- Agreements
- Compensation Principle
-
LKH v TQA AL Z [2018] EWHC 121419 April 2018
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2018/1214.html
- Cases
- Legal Services Payment Orders
-
Tobias v Tobias [2017] EWFC 4629 June 2017
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2017/46.html
- Cases
- Interim Relief
- Freezing Injunctions
- Efficient Conduct
-
FB v PS [2015] EWHC 2797 (Fam)30 July 2015
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2015/2797.html
- Cases
- Sharing Principle
- Costs
- Trusts
-
AW v AH [2020] EWFC 2221 April 2020
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2020/22.html
- Cases
- Clean Breaks and Term Maintenance
- Costs
- Legal Services Payment Orders
-
M v W [2014] EWHC 925 (Fam)2 April 2014
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/925.html
- Cases
- Overseas Divorce and the 1984 Act
-
Chai v Peng [2014] EWHC 750 (Fam)13 March 2014
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/750.html
- Cases
- Life Expectancy
-
LS v PS [2021] EWHC 3508 (Fam)18 January 2022
An application by an intervenor in financial remedy proceedings for disclosure of privileged material from a PFDR was refused. The intervenor, a litigation funder, is seeking to set aside a consent order reached at the PFDR on the basis it was deliberately structured to ensure W could not meet her debt. The court acknowledged that a number of competing policy considerations were engaged, in the process attaching importance to the status of litigation funders. Whilst this application was refused on the facts, Roberts J referred the “absolute bar” (as Munby P has interpreted paragraph 6.2 PD9A) on use of anything said or done at FDR in support of a separate action in civil proceedings to the Family Procedure Rules Committee. In further judicial support for private dispute resolution, Roberts J thought it artificial to draw a distinction between the privilege attaching under paragraph 6.2 PD9A to “in-court” and private FDRs.
- Cases
- FDRs
- Privilege
- Disclosure
- Litigation Funding
- Joinder of Third Parties
-
FZ v SZ [2010] EWHC 1630 (Fam)5 July 2010
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2010/1630.html
- Cases
- Foreign Assets
- Valuations
©2023 Class Legal classlegal.com
