Published: 18/02/2022 10:20
Holly is a barrister at 5 Pump Court whose practice focuses on financial remedies and TLATA 1996. From 2020 to 2021 she was a judicial assistant in the High Court (Family Division) and was involved in some of the most high-profile cases during the period. Holly regularly speaks at seminars on a variety of topics and provides training to other legal professionals.
©2024 Class Legal classlegal.com
On 11 January 2025, the pro forma schedule of assets known to all as the ES2 turned three years old. Just like the little girl (with the little curl, right in the middle of her forehead) of nursery rhyme fame, who one imagines may be of a similar age, when it’s good, it’s very good, and when it’s bad, it’s horrid.
!11/04/2025 07:00
Sir James Munby reviews the new Dictionary of the Court of Protection.
!23/04/2025 09:50
Cobb J. Application of James v Seymour formula for child maintenance under Sch 1 in this long-running case.
Trowell J. Wife’s unsuccessful appeal against the rejection of her Barrell application to reopen a final order in a needs case following the husband’s father’s death. Trowell J agreed with the trial judge that the husband’s inheritance prospects were uncertain, and the principle of finality ought to be favoured over re-opening the case.
HHJ Tindal. An unusual case, involving two appeals arising from longstanding TLATA claims involving the former family home. Mr Needham’s application to vary the consent order which was made in 2017 was refused. He sought ‘permission to apply’ to set aside that refusal, permission being required because of an LCRO. Permission to apply was refused; Mr Needham appealed. This judgment deals with his application to set aside that refusal.
message
