TB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and RB (CSM) (Child support - cancellation) [2017] UKUT 218 (AAC) (5 October 2016)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> TB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and RB (CSM) (Child support - cancellation) [2017] UKUT 218 (AAC) (5 October 2016)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/218.html
Cite as: [2017] UKUT 218 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

This concerns the meaning of ‘ceased to have effect’ in paragraph 16 schedule 1 Child Support Act 1991 and related provisions under the old (1993) scheme. There is a distinction in relation to the need for formal adjudication about an event which calls for investigation as to the need for cancellation, and the position where a supervening event inevitably causes a maintenance assessment to cease to have effect. In the latter case a formal decision (as opposed to simple notification) is not required.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 218.pdf

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/218.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> TB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and RB (CSM) (Child support - cancellation) [2017] UKUT 218 (AAC) (5 October 2016) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/218.html Cite as: [2017] UKUT 218 (AAC)